Atlas
Project 001 · Understand How This Decision Was Made

Confirm synthetic substitution as a hedge

Evaluated and deprioritized for the initial phase; revisit if natural flake qualification stalls.

Archived
Everything below reflects exactly what was known as of 2026-02-15 — the evidence available, the risks on record, and the reasoning that followed. Nothing here has been revised with hindsight.
Decision Rationale
Low

No rationale recorded for this decision.

Supporting Evidence Cited
IDDateCategoryConfidenceNotes
EV-0052026-01-22TechnicalHighSynthetic graphite production is energy-intensive relative to natural flake processing.
Evidence Available Then
6 records existed as of 2026-02-15
IDDateCategoryNotes
EV-0062026-02-14InfrastructurePort of Long Beach has existing bulk materials handling infrastructure.
EV-0012026-02-11MarketBattery-grade anode graphite processing capacity is geographically concentrated outside North America.
EV-0082026-02-08InfrastructureWater availability is a material siting constraint in the Imperial Valley.
EV-0042026-02-05RegulatoryQualification cycles for new anode material suppliers typically span multiple quarters.
EV-0032026-01-30GeologyBrazil and Argentina have documented flake graphite deposits at varying development stages.
EV-0052026-01-22TechnicalSynthetic graphite production is energy-intensive relative to natural flake processing.
Risks Known Then
2 risks logged as of 2026-02-15
Spheronization capacity bottleneck

Limited non-domestic facilities convert flake to battery-grade spherical graphite; delays here block the entire pathway.

HighOpen
Water availability constraint

Processing facility siting in the Imperial Valley is sensitive to regional water allocation limits.

MediumMonitoring
Unknown Factors

No unknown factors recorded for this decision.

Outcome

Outcome not yet recorded — this decision may still be open.

Lessons Learned

No lessons learned recorded for this decision.