Scenarios, compared side by side
Each scenario states its benefits, risks, dependencies, and the evidence that supports it. Atlas evaluates scenarios against current evidence — it does not predict which one will occur.
Build a domestic processing facility against imported flake from multiple source regions.
- +Reduces dependency on a single non-domestic processing supplier
- +Creates a controllable, auditable domestic pathway
- +Positions for future domestic incentive programs
- –High capital cost
- –Long permitting timeline
- –Energy cost exposure
- EV-002 — Imperial Valley region has existing industrial power and rail infrastructure relevant to materials processing.
- EV-006 — Port of Long Beach has existing bulk materials handling infrastructure.
- EV-008 — Water availability is a material siting constraint in the Imperial Valley.
- EV-009 — Existing geothermal power generation in the Imperial Valley could offset processing energy load.
Import partially processed (spheronized) material and complete only final purification and coating domestically.
- +Lower upfront capital requirement
- +Faster time to qualification
- +Leverages existing non-domestic spheronization capacity
- –Continued dependency on concentrated non-domestic capacity
- –Exposure to trade policy shifts
- EV-001 — Battery-grade anode graphite processing capacity is geographically concentrated outside North America.
- EV-005 — Synthetic graphite production is energy-intensive relative to natural flake processing.
- EV-010 — Bulk storage terminal capacity appears sufficient for initial import volumes.
- EV-011 — Inland trucking capacity may require multi-carrier contracts during ramp-up.
Form a joint venture with a source-region producer to co-invest in processing capacity.
- +Shares capital and permitting risk
- +Aligns incentives with source-region supply
- +Potential preferential offtake terms
- –Governance and control complexity
- –Cross-border regulatory exposure
- –Longer negotiation timeline
- EV-003 — Brazil and Argentina have documented flake graphite deposits at varying development stages.
Site lithium extraction and battery component manufacturing directly against existing geothermal power generation to minimize new transmission needs.
- +Uses existing power infrastructure rather than building new transmission
- +Shortens the supply chain between mineral extraction and manufacturing
- +Aligns with existing geothermal operator interest
- –Water allocation remains a binding constraint regardless of siting
- –Commercial-scale lithium extraction from brine is not yet proven at this site
- IVE-002 — Salton Sea geothermal field has both existing generation capacity and unextracted lithium-bearing brine.
- IVE-003 — Direct lithium extraction from geothermal brine is technically demonstrated but not yet at commercial scale in this specific location.
Integrate Imperial Valley material supply with existing Mexicali manufacturing capacity via the Calexico crossing.
- +Leverages existing cross-border manufacturing relationships
- +Distributes capital cost across two jurisdictions
- +Existing rail and freight infrastructure already connects the two sides
- –Cross-border regulatory and tariff exposure
- –Border crossing congestion could bottleneck throughput
- IVE-005 — Calexico border crossing has existing commercial freight capacity but is subject to periodic congestion.
- IVE-008 — Existing rail corridor has spare freight capacity relative to current regional industrial volume.
Treat water allocation, not land or power, as the primary siting constraint and evaluate all industrial development against it first.
- +Addresses the most binding regional constraint directly
- +Reduces risk of stranded investment in water-unavailable parcels
- –May rule out otherwise attractive sites early
- –Requires renegotiation or reallocation of existing agricultural water rights
- IVE-001 — Colorado River allocation to Imperial Irrigation District is fixed by long-standing agreement and is fully subscribed for agricultural use.
- IVE-004 — Irrigated farmland accounts for the large majority of current regional water use, framing the siting tradeoff for industrial users.
- IVE-007 — Several parcels are zoned for industrial use but lack committed water or power allocations.
Build a domestic processing facility against imported flake from multiple source regions.
- +Reduces dependency on a single non-domestic processing supplier
- +Creates a controllable, auditable domestic pathway
- +Positions for future domestic incentive programs
- –High capital cost
- –Long permitting timeline
- –Energy cost exposure
- EV-002 — Imperial Valley region has existing industrial power and rail infrastructure relevant to materials processing.
- EV-006 — Port of Long Beach has existing bulk materials handling infrastructure.
- EV-008 — Water availability is a material siting constraint in the Imperial Valley.
- EV-009 — Existing geothermal power generation in the Imperial Valley could offset processing energy load.
Import partially processed (spheronized) material and complete only final purification and coating domestically.
- +Lower upfront capital requirement
- +Faster time to qualification
- +Leverages existing non-domestic spheronization capacity
- –Continued dependency on concentrated non-domestic capacity
- –Exposure to trade policy shifts
- EV-001 — Battery-grade anode graphite processing capacity is geographically concentrated outside North America.
- EV-005 — Synthetic graphite production is energy-intensive relative to natural flake processing.
- EV-010 — Bulk storage terminal capacity appears sufficient for initial import volumes.
- EV-011 — Inland trucking capacity may require multi-carrier contracts during ramp-up.
Co-located Lithium and Power compared against Water-Constrained Siting in the scenario workspace.
Water-Constrained Siting scenario drafted, treating water allocation as the primary constraint.
Cross-Border Manufacturing Integration scenario drafted against the entity graph.
Co-located Lithium and Power scenario drafted against the entity graph.
Domestic Processing compared against Import Intermediate Product in the scenario workspace.